Re: xchat.spec updated (again!)

[Spider <spider@bahnhof.se>]

On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:28:36 +1000
Peter Zelezny <zed@linux.com> wrote:

> Thanks... Just a question:
> 
>  Source: http://xchat.org/files/source/1.8/xchat-%{version}.tar.bz2
>  Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
> 
> arn't these invalid now that you removed the %defines?

Nope, those are set automagically by rpm since they are in the header :) in fact the top %defines are to be considered redundant. 


> Also, someone mentioned that Ximian/Red Hat/Mandrake are now using the
> "Epoch" keyword, and that xchat rpms are being seen as older than theirs
> even when the version is higher. Would adding in "Epoch: 1" be a good
> thing to do?

Yes, they are using that, and it tends to break things in a horrid way, but yes.. we probably should use "Epoch: 1" in ours as well.


//Spider
-- 
"The magician asks:  Ought i banish reality?"

-
XChat-discuss: mailing list for XChat users
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/xchat-discuss/
Posted By:     Spider <spider@bahnhof.se>