Re: xchat.spec updated (again!)

[Peter Zelezny <zed@linux.com>]

On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 21:47:35 +0200
Spider <spider@bahnhof.se> wrote:

> okay, I admit.. hold my horses and spank me or something :p 
> 
> I managed to send the wrong patch to the list :/ its noteable from the
lack of a %changelog, as well as that the one i sent lacks several
important things in the "make install" part.. Things that made it attempt
to erase the existing /usr/bin/xchat ... -VERY- bad (especially if you,
like many new to rpm, build your rpm's as root. ; )
> 
> Here's another spec patch.. applies to the clean .spec file.

Thanks... Just a question:

 Source: http://xchat.org/files/source/1.8/xchat-%{version}.tar.bz2
 Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root

arn't these invalid now that you removed the %defines?

Also, someone mentioned that Ximian/Red Hat/Mandrake are now using the
"Epoch" keyword, and that xchat rpms are being seen as older than theirs
even when the version is higher. Would adding in "Epoch: 1" be a good
thing to do?

-- 
Peter Zelezny. <zed@linux.com>
-
XChat-discuss: mailing list for XChat users
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/xchat-discuss/
Posted By:     Peter Zelezny <zed@linux.com>