Re: execute_perl leaks memory, patched

[Peter Zelezny <zed@linux.com>]

On 2001.06.17 12:11:49 +1000 bbarnett@L8R.net wrote:

> Without patch :
> 
> 13170 blah      9   0 30608  29M  4624 S     1.5  9.5   6:09 xchat
> 
> With :
> 
> 13169 blah      9   0 18680  18M  4716 S     2.9  5.8   5:25 xchat
> 
> Same channels, joined at the same time (within seconds) and left running
> for ~
> 3 hours.  There were a total of ~ 700 users in all the channels combined.
>  All
> timed events seemed to work fine during the test. 
> 
> I imagine if something really odd pops up down the road, we can back out
> the
> changes Peter?  If so, I say put it in!  This is quite significant, and
> we owe
> Martin a pat on the back.  This is something that's been around for aeons
> ;).
> 
> Cool ;)

Definately, we've finally found someone that understands that perlembed
stuff :)
It still looks a little excessive (18M) but it's an improvement.

Yes, we can always revert the changes, I doubt that'll be needed.


-- 
Peter Zelezny. <zed@linux.com>
-
XChat-discuss: mailing list for XChat users
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/xchat-discuss/
Posted By:     Peter Zelezny <zed@linux.com>