From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Tue Feb 15 17:46:41 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92229AbQBOQov>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:44:51 +0100
Received: from pear.napri.sk ([195.146.16.2]:5109 "EHLO marsquake.terminus.sk")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92225AbQBOQoY>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:44:24 +0100
Received: from localhost (root@localhost)
	by marsquake.terminus.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04130;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:38:54 +0100
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:38:49 +0100 (CET)
From:   Milan WWW Pikula <www@banan.napri.sk>
To:     medusa@medusa.fornax.sk, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
        securedistros@nl.linux.org, bugtraq@securityfocus.com,
        security@rak.isternet.sk, linux@linux.cz, linux-security@redhat.com
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Medusa DS9 security system
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0002151638370.4039-100000@marsquake.terminus.sk>
X-NCC-RegID: sk.napri
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Greetings,


I'd like to announce the release of stable version of the security
 system Medusa DS9. It's purpose is to increase the security of OS Linux.
 Medusa it one of projects of the Slovak Linux user group (SkLUG).
 It can be downloaded at

        http://medusa.fornax.sk/

Medusa consists of two major parts - linux kernel changes and the user-space
 daemon. Kernel changes do the monitoring of syscalls, filesystem actions,
 processes and they implement the communication protocol. Security daemon
 communicates with the kernel using character device to send and receive
 "packets". Daemon contains the whole logic and implements the concrete
 security policy. That means, that medusa can (as opposite to another
 approaches) implement any model of data protection - it depends only on
 configuration file, which is in fact an program in the internal programming
 language, somewhat similiar to C.

At the logical level there are these changes:
 * separation of processes, files and IPC to the independent groups
   (virtual subsystems)
 * ability to detect, disable or modify any system call from any process
 * ability to detect, ... selected "process actions" like sending signals,
   exec, ...
 * ability to detect, redirect, ... selected file actions, such as access
   to the file and so
 * ability to enforce process to execute an arbitrary code. This feature
   is usefull to enforce logging drom that process and so.

I'd like to answer some of frequently asked questions here:

 Q what relation is between medusa and capabilities?
 A medusa SUPPORTS linux capabilities and can test, set or change them.
 Q how remarkable is the slowdown of this communication between the kernel
   and user-space daemon in the real usage?
 A actually it's insensible. medusa was designed with the question of speed
   in mind, so all informations are stored in kernel. you can specify exactly
   what actions do you need to be watched. on the real servers with about 50
   shell-account users, where we test medusa, is traffic about 11 packets
   per second or less.
   the fact that the daemon is in userspace, gives it the comfort in
   deciding about security reasons and it increases the portability of
   the whole system. (bsd?:)
 Q where it works?
 A linux 2.2.13, 2.2.14, intel. SMP is not fully tested, but it's reported
   to work. we are working on alpha port and other platforms will follow.
 Q where can I find more information?
 A at http://medusa.fornax.sk/ and in ``doc'' subdirectory in the source
   package.

Kind regards,
        Medusa development team
                Marek Zelem
                Martin Ockajak
                Milan Pikula


--
Milan Pikula, WWW. Finger me for Geek Code.
http://fornax.elf.stuba.sk/~www, www@fornax.elf.stuba.sk
.. dajte mi pevnu linku a pohnem zemegulou ..


-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 16 13:04:16 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92168AbQBPMCP>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:02:15 +0100
Received: from imap.atlas.cz ([195.119.187.150]:38674 "EHLO smtp.atlas.cz")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92164AbQBPMBk>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:01:40 +0100
Received: from mail pickup service by smtp.atlas.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:44:54 +0100
Received: from rak.isternet.sk ([195.72.0.6]) by smtp.atlas.cz  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);
	 Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:00:31 +0100
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by rak.isternet.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA29628
	for security-list; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:46:00 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: rak.isternet.sk: majordomo set sender to owner-security@rak.isternet.sk using -f
Received: from marsquake.terminus.sk (pear.napri.sk [195.146.16.2])
	by rak.isternet.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29621
	for <security@rak.isternet.sk>; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:45:59 +0100
Received: from localhost (root@localhost)
	by marsquake.terminus.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04130;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:38:54 +0100
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:38:49 +0100 (CET)
From:   Milan WWW Pikula <www@banan.napri.sk>
To:     medusa@medusa.fornax.sk, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
        securedistros@nl.linux.org, bugtraq@securityfocus.com,
        security@rak.isternet.sk, linux@linux.cz, linux-security@redhat.com
Subject: [security] ANNOUNCE: Medusa DS9 security system
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0002151638370.4039-100000@marsquake.terminus.sk>
X-NCC-RegID: sk.napri
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Greetings,


I'd like to announce the release of stable version of the security
 system Medusa DS9. It's purpose is to increase the security of OS Linux.
 Medusa it one of projects of the Slovak Linux user group (SkLUG).
 It can be downloaded at

        http://medusa.fornax.sk/

Medusa consists of two major parts - linux kernel changes and the user-space
 daemon. Kernel changes do the monitoring of syscalls, filesystem actions,
 processes and they implement the communication protocol. Security daemon
 communicates with the kernel using character device to send and receive
 "packets". Daemon contains the whole logic and implements the concrete
 security policy. That means, that medusa can (as opposite to another
 approaches) implement any model of data protection - it depends only on
 configuration file, which is in fact an program in the internal programming
 language, somewhat similiar to C.

At the logical level there are these changes:
 * separation of processes, files and IPC to the independent groups
   (virtual subsystems)
 * ability to detect, disable or modify any system call from any process
 * ability to detect, ... selected "process actions" like sending signals,
   exec, ...
 * ability to detect, redirect, ... selected file actions, such as access
   to the file and so
 * ability to enforce process to execute an arbitrary code. This feature
   is usefull to enforce logging drom that process and so.

I'd like to answer some of frequently asked questions here:

 Q what relation is between medusa and capabilities?
 A medusa SUPPORTS linux capabilities and can test, set or change them.
 Q how remarkable is the slowdown of this communication between the kernel
   and user-space daemon in the real usage?
 A actually it's insensible. medusa was designed with the question of speed
   in mind, so all informations are stored in kernel. you can specify exactly
   what actions do you need to be watched. on the real servers with about 50
   shell-account users, where we test medusa, is traffic about 11 packets
   per second or less.
   the fact that the daemon is in userspace, gives it the comfort in
   deciding about security reasons and it increases the portability of
   the whole system. (bsd?:)
 Q where it works?
 A linux 2.2.13, 2.2.14, intel. SMP is not fully tested, but it's reported
   to work. we are working on alpha port and other platforms will follow.
 Q where can I find more information?
 A at http://medusa.fornax.sk/ and in ``doc'' subdirectory in the source
   package.

Kind regards,
        Medusa development team
                Marek Zelem
                Martin Ockajak
                Milan Pikula


--
Milan Pikula, WWW. Finger me for Geek Code.
http://fornax.elf.stuba.sk/~www, www@fornax.elf.stuba.sk
.. dajte mi pevnu linku a pohnem zemegulou ..

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Wed Feb 16 13:05:22 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92179AbQBPMDU>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:03:20 +0100
Received: from imap.atlas.cz ([195.119.187.150]:17428 "EHLO smtp.atlas.cz")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92177AbQBPMCs>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:02:48 +0100
Received: from mail pickup service by smtp.atlas.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:44:49 +0100
Received: from rak.isternet.sk ([195.72.0.6]) by smtp.atlas.cz  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);
	 Tue, 15 Feb 2000 22:43:43 +0100
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by rak.isternet.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA07679
	for security-list; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 22:33:17 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: rak.isternet.sk: majordomo set sender to owner-security@rak.isternet.sk using -f
Received: from alfa.ranni-ptace.loc (datela-1-4-99.vol.cz [212.20.98.133])
	by rak.isternet.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA07666
	for <security@rak.isternet.sk>; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 22:32:54 +0100
Received: (qmail 11333 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2000 21:36:13 -0000
Received: from milada.troja.mff.cuni.cz by localhost with POP3
	(fetchmail-5.0.7) for marian@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 15
	Feb 2000 22:36:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from SpoolDir by MILADA (Mercury 1.31); 15 Feb 100 17:45:05
	+0100
Received: from kerberos2.troja.mff.cuni.cz by milada.troja.mff.cuni.cz
	(Mercury 1.31); 15 Feb 100 17:44:58 +0100
Received: (qmail 1751 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2000 16:44:55 -0000
Received: from odysseus.fi.muni.cz (HELO odysseus.linux.cz)
	(147.251.48.205) by milada.troja.mff.cuni.cz with SMTP; 15 Feb
	2000 16:44:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 22663 invoked by uid 30); 15 Feb 2000 16:44:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact linux-help@linux.cz; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list linux@linux.cz
Received: (qmail 22655 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2000 16:44:36 -0000
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:38:49 +0100 (CET)
From:   Milan WWW Pikula <www@banan.napri.sk>
To:     medusa@medusa.fornax.sk, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
        securedistros@nl.linux.org, bugtraq@securityfocus.com,
        security@rak.isternet.sk, linux@linux.cz, linux-security@redhat.com
Subject: [security] ANNOUNCE: Medusa DS9 security system
Message-Id: 
	<Pine.LNX.4.20.0002151638370.4039-100000@marsquake.terminus.sk>
X-Ncc-Regid: sk.napri
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mime2latin2: 1 MIME parts converted to iso-8859-2
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Greetings,


I'd like to announce the release of stable version of the security
 system Medusa DS9. It's purpose is to increase the security of OS Linux.
 Medusa it one of projects of the Slovak Linux user group (SkLUG).
 It can be downloaded at

        http://medusa.fornax.sk/

Medusa consists of two major parts - linux kernel changes and the user-space
 daemon. Kernel changes do the monitoring of syscalls, filesystem actions,
 processes and they implement the communication protocol. Security daemon
 communicates with the kernel using character device to send and receive
 "packets". Daemon contains the whole logic and implements the concrete
 security policy. That means, that medusa can (as opposite to another
 approaches) implement any model of data protection - it depends only on
 configuration file, which is in fact an program in the internal programming
 language, somewhat similiar to C.

At the logical level there are these changes:
 * separation of processes, files and IPC to the independent groups
   (virtual subsystems)
 * ability to detect, disable or modify any system call from any process
 * ability to detect, ... selected "process actions" like sending signals,
   exec, ...
 * ability to detect, redirect, ... selected file actions, such as access
   to the file and so
 * ability to enforce process to execute an arbitrary code. This feature
   is usefull to enforce logging drom that process and so.

I'd like to answer some of frequently asked questions here:

 Q what relation is between medusa and capabilities?
 A medusa SUPPORTS linux capabilities and can test, set or change them.
 Q how remarkable is the slowdown of this communication between the kernel
   and user-space daemon in the real usage?
 A actually it's insensible. medusa was designed with the question of speed
   in mind, so all informations are stored in kernel. you can specify exactly
   what actions do you need to be watched. on the real servers with about 50
   shell-account users, where we test medusa, is traffic about 11 packets
   per second or less.
   the fact that the daemon is in userspace, gives it the comfort in
   deciding about security reasons and it increases the portability of
   the whole system. (bsd?:)
 Q where it works?
 A linux 2.2.13, 2.2.14, intel. SMP is not fully tested, but it's reported
   to work. we are working on alpha port and other platforms will follow.
 Q where can I find more information?
 A at http://medusa.fornax.sk/ and in ``doc'' subdirectory in the source
   package.

Kind regards,
        Medusa development team
                Marek Zelem
                Martin Ockajak
                Milan Pikula


--
Milan Pikula, WWW. Finger me for Geek Code.
http://fornax.elf.stuba.sk/~www, www@fornax.elf.stuba.sk
... dajte mi pevnu linku a pohnem zemegulou ..



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meta-FAQ (odhlá¹ení, archív, FAQ a dal¹í): http://www.linux.cz/mailing-list
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 07:05:13 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92194AbQBQGDn>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:03:43 +0100
Received: from f117.law3.hotmail.com ([209.185.241.117]:27919 "HELO
        hotmail.com") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with SMTP id <S92183AbQBQGDH>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:03:07 +0100
Received: (qmail 29542 invoked by uid 0); 17 Feb 2000 05:58:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20000217055816.29541.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 12.73.96.82 by www.hotmail.com with =?ISO-8859-1?Q?HTTP;=0D?=	Wed, 16 Feb 2000 21:58:16 PST
X-Originating-IP: [12.73.96.82]
From:   "nels weber" <nelsweber@hotmail.com>
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2000 21:58:16 PST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Lately, I've become very interested in two things.. cryptography and linux. 
Frankly any blending of the two is an exciting prospect to me. If you have 
any information to pass on I'd appreciate it.
Thank you.

Nels Weber

PS also if you could recomend a secure e-mail server on the web I'd 
appreciate it more than the other info. as all I can get on the net so far 
is alot of flack.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 13:55:50 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92210AbQBQMyY>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:54:24 +0100
Received: from storm.ca ([209.87.239.69]:22449 "EHLO mail.storm.ca")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92204AbQBQMx4>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:53:56 +0100
Received: from storm.ca (ppp024.ottawa.storm.ca [209.87.227.24])
	by mail.storm.ca (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA24327
	for <securedistros@nl.linux.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:49:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <38ABEE9D.33168951@storm.ca>
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:50:37 -0500
From:   Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
References: <20000217055816.29541.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

nels weber wrote:
> 
> Lately, I've become very interested in two things.. cryptography and linux.
> Frankly any blending of the two is an exciting prospect to me. If you have
> any information to pass on I'd appreciate it.
> Thank you.

One project adding strong crypto to Linux is:
http://www.freeswan.org

Their collection of web links should lead you to others:
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.3/doc/WWWref.html
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 20:05:20 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92163AbQBQTDl>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:03:41 +0100
Received: from ns1.umkc.edu ([134.193.1.2]:12805 "EHLO ns1.umkc.edu")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92189AbQBQTDT>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:03:19 +0100
Received: from cstp.umkc.edu (IDENT:david@lucy [134.193.69.99])
	by ns1.umkc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA30051;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:58:26 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <38AC44B7.91562A41@cstp.umkc.edu>
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:57:59 +0000
From:   "David L. Nicol" <dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu>
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City network operations
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-mosix i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     nels weber <nelsweber@hotmail.com>, securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
References: <20000217055816.29541.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

nels weber wrote:
> 
> Lately, I've become very interested in two things.. cryptography and linux.
> Frankly any blending of the two is an exciting prospect to me. If you have
> any information to pass on I'd appreciate it.
> Thank you.
> 
> Nels Weber
> 
> PS also if you could recomend a secure e-mail server on the web I'd
> appreciate it more than the other info. as all I can get on the net so far
> is alot of flack.
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> 
> -
> Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
> Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/


qmail


gnupg


the fact that you are looking for a "secure e-mail server" indicates
a certain ignorance, as SMTP protocol at this time specifies that
the message stream is not encrypted, making it susceptible to 
"packet sniffing."

This vulnerability can be overcome by encrypting the message using a 
tool such as the GNU Privacy Guard (largely based on the work of a
certain Phil Zimmerman).

There is not at this time a standard for encrypting the entire channel
between mail servers, and it is unlikely that one will appear.  When
there is risk of people reading the traffic that goes by, a better
solution is to encrypt the entire network into a "virtual private
network."

For use internal to your organization, encryption of the smtp stream
can be added to any open source MTA without great difficulty.

 

___________________________________________________________________
                           David Nicol 816.235.1187 nicold@umkc.edu
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 20:51:34 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92243AbQBQTtS>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:49:18 +0100
Received: from polymorph.qcsn.com ([198.145.93.5]:11605 "EHLO
        polymorph.qcsn.com") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP
	id <S92244AbQBQTsY>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:48:24 +0100
Received: from localhost (IDENT:wcooley@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by polymorph.qcsn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13518
	for <securedistros@nl.linux.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 11:43:33 -0800
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2000 11:43:33 -0800 (PST)
From:   Wil Cooley <wcooley@nakedape.cc>
X-Sender: wcooley@polymorph.qcsn.com
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
In-Reply-To: <38AC44B7.91562A41@cstp.umkc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002171138460.12734-100000@polymorph.qcsn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:

> There is not at this time a standard for encrypting the entire channel
> between mail servers, and it is unlikely that one will appear.  When
> there is risk of people reading the traffic that goes by, a better
> solution is to encrypt the entire network into a "virtual private
> network."

What about SMTP over SSL/TLS?  While in MTA-MTA connections it's not
likely that both will run SSL, and of course without an Internet-wide PKI
you cannot guarantee hosts' identities, you can fairly easily secure
connections between MUA-MTA, which, for remote users, is a big benefit.

Wil
-- 
W. Reilly Cooley                           wcooley@nakedape.cc
The LNX System: Linux for a 2U case.           http://lnxs.org

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 21:34:28 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92247AbQBQUcu>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:32:50 +0100
Received: from ns1.umkc.edu ([134.193.1.2]:10760 "EHLO ns1.umkc.edu")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92215AbQBQUcV>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:32:21 +0100
Received: from cstp.umkc.edu (IDENT:david@lucy [134.193.69.99])
	by ns1.umkc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA31327;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:27:35 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <38AC599B.ADD100D8@cstp.umkc.edu>
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:27:07 +0000
From:   "David L. Nicol" <dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu>
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City network operations
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-mosix i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org, wcooley@nakedape.cc
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002171138460.12734-100000@polymorph.qcsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Wil Cooley wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
> 
> > There is not at this time a standard for encrypting the entire channel
> > between mail servers, 
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
> What about SMTP over SSL/TLS?  While in MTA-MTA connections it's not
> likely that both will run SSL, and of course without an Internet-wide PKI
> you cannot guarantee hosts' identities, you can fairly easily secure
> connections between MUA-MTA, which, for remote users, is a big benefit.


This is true, it protects you from packet sniffing from the next
cubicle, which is obviously a more realistic threat than packet
sniffing on the backbone.

There was a freshmeat.net announcement recently of an add-on to
provide SSL-SMTP to any SMTP MTA.


___________________________________________________________________
                           David Nicol 816.235.1187 nicold@umkc.edu
                                                        wget rocks!
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Thu Feb 17 21:41:00 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92270AbQBQUjL>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:39:11 +0100
Received: from polymorph.qcsn.com ([198.145.93.5]:19808 "EHLO
        polymorph.qcsn.com") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP
	id <S92252AbQBQUis>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:38:48 +0100
Received: from localhost (IDENT:wcooley@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by polymorph.qcsn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA13954;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:33:55 -0800
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:33:55 -0800 (PST)
From:   Wil Cooley <wcooley@nakedape.cc>
X-Sender: wcooley@polymorph.qcsn.com
To:     "David L. Nicol" <dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu>
cc:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
In-Reply-To: <38AC599B.ADD100D8@cstp.umkc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002171233170.12734-100000@polymorph.qcsn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:

> There was a freshmeat.net announcement recently of an add-on to
> provide SSL-SMTP to any SMTP MTA.

There's also patches for Postfix to use TLS.

Wil
-- 
W. Reilly Cooley                           wcooley@nakedape.cc
The LNX System: Linux for a 2U case.           http://lnxs.org

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Fri Feb 18 07:06:58 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92192AbQBRGFV>;
	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:05:21 +0100
Received: from terra.geo.uu.nl ([131.211.29.16]:60549 "EHLO terra.geo.uu.nl")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92180AbQBRGEq>;
	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:04:46 +0100
Received: from simulcara (ip93-ftl.aibusiness.net [208.235.123.93])
	by terra.geo.uu.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/TvZ) with ESMTP id GAA23755
	for <securedistros@nl.linux.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 06:59:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from leto by simulcara with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
	id 12LgMT-0000ng-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 00:53:53 -0500
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2000 00:53:53 -0500
From:   Jonathan Leto <leto@leto.net>
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
Message-ID: <20000218005353.A3067@leto.net>
References: <20000217055816.29541.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i
In-Reply-To: <20000217055816.29541.qmail@hotmail.com>; from nelsweber@hotmail.com on Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 09:58:16PM -0800
X-Echelon-Bait: password kill bomb terrorist president cult
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

I beleive hushmail.com should be of interest to you.
I think that if two people with hushmail accounts email each other,
that the data never exists or is passed through any system unencrypted 
( except maybe in your browser cache.) 

 nels weber (nelsweber@hotmail.com) said:

> Lately, I've become very interested in two things.. cryptography and linux. 
> Frankly any blending of the two is an exciting prospect to me. If you have 
> any information to pass on I'd appreciate it.
> Thank you.
> 
> Nels Weber
> 
> PS also if you could recomend a secure e-mail server on the web I'd 
> appreciate it more than the other info. as all I can get on the net so far 
> is alot of flack.
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> 
> -
> Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
> Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

-- 
jonathan@leto.net 
http://leto.net
"With pain comes clarity."


-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Fri Feb 18 14:44:09 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92189AbQBRNml>;
	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:42:41 +0100
Received: from tube.net-tel.co.uk ([193.122.171.130]:44554 "EHLO
        tube.net-tel.co.uk") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP
	id <S92180AbQBRNmC>; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:42:02 +0100
Received: from net-tel.co.uk (ice.net-tel.co.uk [193.122.171.250])
	by tube.net-tel.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07662
	for <securedistros@nl.linux.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:37:02 GMT
From:   Michael.Owen@net-tel.co.uk
Received: from "/PRMD=NET-TEL/ADMD=Gold 400/C=GB/" by net-tel.co.uk
        (Route400-RFCGate); Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:36:47 +0000
X400-Received: by mta "ice" in "/PRMD=net-tel/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/"; 
        Relayed; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:36:47 +0000
X400-Received: by mta "net-tel" in "/PRMD=net-tel/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/"; 
        Relayed; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:36:09 +0000
X400-Received: by "/PRMD=NET-TEL/ADMD=Gold 400/C=GB/"; Relayed; 
        Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:36:09 +0000
X400-MTS-Identifier: 
        ["/PRMD=NET-TEL/ADMD=Gold 400/C=GB/";ORANGE:0081-000218133609-0ef4]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
X400-Originator: Michael.Owen@net-tel.co.uk
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: 
        IA5-Text, (2)(6)(1)(12)(0), (1)(2)(840)(113556)(3)(10)(1)
X400-Recipients: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:36:09 +0000
X400-Content-Identifier: RE: I'm very int
Message-Id: <"GRAPE:05e8-000218133747-0004*/G=Michael/S=Owen/O=NET-TEL Computer Systems Ltd/PRMD=NET-TEL/ADMD=Gold 400/C=GB/"@MHS>
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
In-Reply-To: <38AC44B7.91562A41@cstp.umkc.edu>
Subject: RE: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

David L. Nicol wrote:
> nels weber wrote:
> > 

<snip>

> There is not at this time a standard for encrypting the entire channel
> between mail servers, and it is unlikely that one will appear.  When
> there is risk of people reading the traffic that goes by, a better
> solution is to encrypt the entire network into a "virtual private
> network."

Well, there is an Internet draft at the moment, and there are products emerging which support domain to domain-based encryption and signing. Check out http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-domsec-03.txt
for more details on the technical side of things.

When the only thing that you actually want to encrypt is email, using a VPN is sort of like duck hunting with a bazooka. You also lose encryption coverage to remote clients who don't want/have VPNs, but have mail encryption tools handy.

--
Michael

Michael Owen
IT Security Engineer
NET-TEL Computer Systems Ltd
Michael.Owen@net-tel.co.uk

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 01:12:42 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92221AbQBTALC>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 01:11:02 +0100
Received: from terra.geo.uu.nl ([131.211.29.16]:47299 "EHLO terra.geo.uu.nl")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92204AbQBTAKZ>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 01:10:25 +0100
Received: from mailmachine9397.compuserve.com (98AE29CB.ipt.aol.com [152.174.41.203])
	by terra.geo.uu.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/TvZ) with SMTP id BAA28507
	for <securedistros@nl.linux.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 01:05:37 +0100 (MET)
From:   <hifiber7@compuserve.com>
To:     <securedistros@nl.linux.org>
Date:   Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:29:05
Message-Id: <205.112797.858234@mailmachine9397.compuserve.com>
Subject: AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Message sent by:  Kuppler Graphics, 32 West Main Street, Maple 
Shade, New Jersey, 08052,
1-800-810-4330.   This list will NOT be sold.  All addresses 
are automatically added to our remove list.

Hello.  My name is Bill from Kuppler Graphics.  We do 
screenprinting on T Shirts, Sweatshirts,
Jackets, Hats, Tote Bags and more!

Do you or someone you know have a Family Reunion coming up?  
Kuppler Graphics would like to
provide you with some great looking T Shirts for your Reunion.

Kuppler Graphics can also provide you with custom T's and 
promotional items such as imprinted
magnets, keychains, pens, mugs, hats, etc. for your business or 
any fundraising activity
(church, school, business etc.) We also can provide you with 
quality embroidery. 

We are a family owned company with over 15 years of experience.  

All work is done at this location.  No middle man.  Our prices 
are great!

Click reply to email us or call 1-800-810-4330 for more info


Bill
Kuppler Graphics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 03:27:40 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92205AbQBTC0E>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 03:26:04 +0100
Received: from adsl-216-103-8-86.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net ([216.103.8.86]:55822
        "HELO freeside.ultraviolet.org") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with SMTP
	id <S92204AbQBTCZj>; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 03:25:39 +0100
Received: (qmail 31060 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2000 02:20:51 -0000
Date:   Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:20:51 -0800
From:   Tracy R Reed <treed@ultraviolet.org>
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
Message-ID: <20000219182051.I4759@ultraviolet.org>
References: <205.112797.858234@mailmachine9397.compuserve.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <205.112797.858234@mailmachine9397.compuserve.com>; from hifiber7@compuserve.com on Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:29:05PM +0000
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:29:05PM +0000, hifiber7@compuserve.com wrote:
> 1-800-810-4330.   This list will NOT be sold.  All addresses 

Everyone call up "Bill" on his dime and let him enjoy some of your favorite
tunes until his answering machine runs out of tape.

He is currently enjoying "Miami" by Will Smith. :)

--
Tracy Reed      http://www.ultraviolet.org
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 07:22:43 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92200AbQBTGVQ>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 07:21:16 +0100
Received: from sense-nahlquis-101.oz.net ([216.39.152.101]:23436 "HELO
        sense-nahlquis-101.oz.net") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with SMTP
	id <S92182AbQBTGUj>; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 07:20:39 +0100
Received: (qmail 20738 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2000 06:13:18 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2000 06:13:18 -0000
Date:   Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:13:18 -0800 (PST)
From:   Norm Ahlquist <norm@mselectron.com>
X-Sender: norm@jhgrud
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
In-Reply-To: <205.112797.858234@mailmachine9397.compuserve.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10002192211120.20736-100000@jhgrud>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Greetings to the list, perhaps.

What the ... is this. Someone hacking the list?

Kill the bugger.

Norm




On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 hifiber7@compuserve.com wrote:

> Message sent by:  Kuppler Graphics, 32 West Main Street, Maple 
> Shade, New Jersey, 08052,
> 1-800-810-4330.   This list will NOT be sold.  All addresses 
> are automatically added to our remove list.
> 
> Hello.  My name is Bill from Kuppler Graphics.  We do 
> screenprinting on T Shirts, Sweatshirts,
> Jackets, Hats, Tote Bags and more!
> 
> Do you or someone you know have a Family Reunion coming up?  
> Kuppler Graphics would like to
> provide you with some great looking T Shirts for your Reunion.
> 
> Kuppler Graphics can also provide you with custom T's and 
> promotional items such as imprinted
> magnets, keychains, pens, mugs, hats, etc. for your business or 
> any fundraising activity
> (church, school, business etc.) We also can provide you with 
> quality embroidery. 
> 
> We are a family owned company with over 15 years of experience.  
> 
> All work is done at this location.  No middle man.  Our prices 
> are great!
> 
> Click reply to email us or call 1-800-810-4330 for more info
> 
> 
> Bill
> Kuppler Graphics
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> -
> Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
> Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/
> 

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 08:15:13 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92182AbQBTHNt>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:13:49 +0100
Received: from wirex.com ([208.161.110.91]:4974 "HELO mithra.wirex.com")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with SMTP id <S92175AbQBTHNO>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:13:14 +0100
Received: from wirex.com (mithra.wirex.com [208.161.110.91])
	by mithra.wirex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DBA3EC14
	for <securedistros@nl.linux.org>; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 23:07:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <38AF7191.2AA96D92@wirex.com>
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2000 04:46:10 +0000
From:   Crispin Cowan <crispin@wirex.com>
Organization: WireX Communications, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.35 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
References: <205.112797.858234@mailmachine9397.compuserve.com> <20000219182051.I4759@ultraviolet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

Tracy R Reed wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:29:05PM +0000, hifiber7@compuserve.com wrote:
> > 1-800-810-4330.   This list will NOT be sold.  All addresses
>
> Everyone call up "Bill" on his dime and let him enjoy some of your favorite
> tunes until his answering machine runs out of tape.
>
> He is currently enjoying "Miami" by Will Smith. :)

I've often wanted to do that, but I'm concerned that I've heard of telphone
hacks that can result in 1-800 numbers being a toll call.  Can anyone confirm
or deny whether one can be *assured* that a 1-800 number is in fact toll-free?

Thanks,
    Crispin
-----
Crispin Cowan, CTO, WireX Communications, Inc.    http://wirex.com
Free Hardened Linux Distribution:                 http://immunix.org
                  JOBS!  http://immunix.org/jobs.html



-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 09:26:54 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92194AbQBTIZ1>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 09:25:27 +0100
Received: from adsl-216-103-8-86.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net ([216.103.8.86]:17932
        "HELO freeside.ultraviolet.org") by humbolt.nl.linux.org with SMTP
	id <S92183AbQBTIYy>; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 09:24:54 +0100
Received: (qmail 12351 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2000 08:20:06 -0000
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:20:06 -0800
From:   Tracy R Reed <treed@ultraviolet.org>
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
Message-ID: <20000220002006.D6251@ultraviolet.org>
References: <205.112797.858234@mailmachine9397.compuserve.com> <20000219182051.I4759@ultraviolet.org> <38AF7191.2AA96D92@wirex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <38AF7191.2AA96D92@wirex.com>; from crispin@wirex.com on Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 04:46:10AM +0000
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 04:46:10AM +0000, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> I've often wanted to do that, but I'm concerned that I've heard of telphone
> hacks that can result in 1-800 numbers being a toll call.  Can anyone confirm
> or deny whether one can be *assured* that a 1-800 number is in fact toll-free?

I've heard of various PBX and other phone system social engineering hacks but
they all involve you entering numbers other than 1-800. Besides, this guy
clearly wants to sell you shirts and stuff, not get rich off of long distance
scams.

--
Tracy Reed      http://www.ultraviolet.org
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

From owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org Sun Feb 20 12:27:56 2000
Received: by humbolt.nl.linux.org id <S92202AbQBTL03>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:26:29 +0100
Received: from agratax.demon.nl ([212.238.108.69]:26119 "EHLO agratax.demon.nl")
	by humbolt.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S92183AbQBTL0C>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:26:02 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:20743 "EHLO localhost")
	by mirkwood.nl.linux.org with ESMTP id <S104564AbQBTLCP>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:02:15 +0100
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:02:13 +0100 (CET)
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
X-Sender: riel@mirkwood.dummy.home
To:     securedistros@nl.linux.org
cc:     "David L. Nicol" <dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu>
Subject: Re: I'm very interested in any info. you have to give.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002171233170.12734-100000@polymorph.qcsn.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002201201580.2505-100000@mirkwood.dummy.home>
Organisation: NL.linux.org (http://www.nl.linux.org/)
X-Search-Engine-Bait: http://www.nl.linux.org/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: securedistros@nl.linux.org
Return-Path: <owner-securedistros@nl.linux.org>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;securedistros-list

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Wil Cooley wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
> 
> > There was a freshmeat.net announcement recently of an add-on to
> > provide SSL-SMTP to any SMTP MTA.
> 
> There's also patches for Postfix to use TLS.

I believe zmailer and Exim can do TLS too.

Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/

