Re: Linux at C2 - was Re: Is this mail list dead?

[Pavel Kankovsky <peak@argo.troja.mff.cuni.cz>]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Pedro Rosa wrote:

> Good but no good... I don't live in Sweden or EU either...Most people 
> don't really care about security even in those places where CAPP would 
> be more than necessary.

On the other hand, most computers are located in developed countries
where (some) people care...

> Under such an environment, a general distro with "security enhanced" 
> will be just damaging...Well, in fact there is a need to make a general
> highly secured "lamers-safe" distro.

Excuse me? Security enhancements are bad but high security is needed?
Or have the quotation marks in "security enhanced" any special meaning
(e.g. to denote an irony)?

--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak  [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/