Re: help save packet storm

["Gerrie" <gerrie@hit2000.org>]

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Alex de Joode <usura@attic.replay.com>
Aan: securedistros@humbolt.nl.linux.org <securedistros@humbolt.nl.linux.org>


>>
>> On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Gerrie wrote:
>>
>> > just a few minutes ago I red about packet storm, at the same moment I
>> > mailed the head sponsor of HIT2000 -Multiaccess- and asked them off I
>> > may offer packetstorm a sponsership by Multiaccess under there own
>> > domainname -packetstorm.net or .org -.
>> >
>> > Multiaccess will IMHO -if there a wise- probaly sponsor them.
>>
>> I do hope that Multiaccess is aware of the fact that packetstorm
>> was/is generating 8GB+ of traffic a DAY.  A kernel.org like mirror
>> system probably is the only viable way to sustain packet storm in
>> the future, and for that much traffic we're probably looking at
>> 50+ mirrors that are automatically upgraded by rsync.
>>
>
>Looks we have some room ;)
>
>Filesystem         1024-blocks  Used Available Capacity Mounted on
>/dev/sdc1            8089583 2850200  5239383     35%   /pub
>
>
We ? Do you work at Multiaccess?

gtx,
Gerrie


-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/