Re: help save packet storm

[Alex de Joode <usura@attic.replay.com>]

> 
> On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Gerrie wrote:
> 
> > just a few minutes ago I red about packet storm, at the same moment I
> > mailed the head sponsor of HIT2000 -Multiaccess- and asked them off I
> > may offer packetstorm a sponsership by Multiaccess under there own
> > domainname -packetstorm.net or .org -.
> > 
> > Multiaccess will IMHO -if there a wise- probaly sponsor them.
> 
> I do hope that Multiaccess is aware of the fact that packetstorm
> was/is generating 8GB+ of traffic a DAY.  A kernel.org like mirror
> system probably is the only viable way to sustain packet storm in
> the future, and for that much traffic we're probably looking at
> 50+ mirrors that are automatically upgraded by rsync.
> 

Looks we have some room ;)

Filesystem         1024-blocks  Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/sdc1            8089583 2850200  5239383     35%   /pub


-aj-
-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/