Re: help save packet storm

[Rik van Riel <riel@humbolt.nl.linux.org>]

On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Gerrie wrote:

> just a few minutes ago I red about packet storm, at the same moment I
> mailed the head sponsor of HIT2000 -Multiaccess- and asked them off I
> may offer packetstorm a sponsership by Multiaccess under there own
> domainname -packetstorm.net or .org -.
> 
> Multiaccess will IMHO -if there a wise- probaly sponsor them.

I do hope that Multiaccess is aware of the fact that packetstorm
was/is generating 8GB+ of traffic a DAY.  A kernel.org like mirror
system probably is the only viable way to sustain packet storm in
the future, and for that much traffic we're probably looking at
50+ mirrors that are automatically upgraded by rsync.

regards,

Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV:               http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site:   http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie:          http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
Securedistros: A common list for all secured Linux distributions
Archive:       http://humbolt.nl.linux.org/lists/