Re: [OFFTOPIC] Spamcop

[Gerhard Mack <gmack@innerfire.net>]

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Rule #3, spammers are stupid.
>
> > But then If Alan Ralsky is any indicator they think they are invincable
> > though I don't understand that attitude either considering how many
> > privacy options are enabled on his cell phone.
>
> Last month Alan Ralsky even did an interview with msnbc:
>
> | http://www.msnbc.com/news/792491.asp
> | Mr. Ralsky appears in all his glory, front and center.
>
> Some reactions from the SPAM-L mailing list:
>
> | I always imagined Spamsky to be a pimply-faced teenager, rather than a
> | poster-wrinkly for the utter failure of his anti-aging-stuff.
>
> | If you look real closely you can see the tip of his huge penis,
> | his massive breasts, his millions of dollars of overnight wealth,
> | his ....

My dislike for Ralsy is personal.. he convinced my former employer to do
the credit card processing and develop porn sites for him. Dumbass
copletely revamped his buisness for Ralsky.  I quit, changed my cell
numnber(yes he had it) and handed all Ralsky's private(real) isp info over
to the anti spam groups along with details of the half proxy trick he was
using to accept connections from panama but reply from the faster isp
in the US.

Between Leo and Ralsky a major Canadian isp was forced to change their
spam policies.

	Gerhard

PS I think 30 million is a low estimate he sent more than that just on the
co owned sites with 2K Services.


--
Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.