[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{

To: linuxperf@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
From: Aaron Burt <aaronb@eskimo.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 18:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <372F962B.ED623B5A@whitewolf.com.au>
Reply-To: linuxperf@nl.linux.org
Sender: owner-linuxperf@humbolt.nl.linux.org

On Wed, 5 May 1999, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:

> I think it would be much more beneficial to 'international' community,
> if you could use longer date format (eg. 04 May 1999). That is if you
> can of course. :-}

That's a good point.  I happen to favor y-m-d for easy sorting, myself.

Am collecting links.  Rattled out an outline for a general essay on
optimization yesterday.

-
Linuxperf:    Working list for the Linux Performance tuning site
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Web site:     http://www.nl.linux.org/linuxperf/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
  - From: Sanjeev Gupta <ghane@arjun.eurolink.stpn.soft.net>

References:
- [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
  - From: Alexandre Rafalovitch <alex@whitewolf.com.au>

Prev by Date: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
Next by Date: Re: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
Prev by thread: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
Next by thread: Re: [linuxperf] Date format. of changelog. :-{
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread