[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode, ISO/IEC 10646 Synchronization Issues for UTF-8
Basically, its a proposal to cap at 10FFFF.
I see no reason to cap utf-8 and utf-32 just to deal with the
limitations of utf-16.
As long as you don't attempt to convert to utf-16, it should not be a
problem. (and eventually, utf-16 should be phased out)
2007/4/24, Christopher Fynn <cfynn@xxxxxxx>:
"ISO/IEC 10646 JTC1/SC2/WG2 N3248 Synchronization Issues for UTF-8"
see: <http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3248.doc>
The document referenced above proposes changes to the specification of
UTF-8 in Annexe D of the ISO/IEC 10646 Standard to make it effectively
the same as the specification of UTF-8 in the Unicode Standard.
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/