[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LC_ALL vs LANG env. variables

To: Damjan <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LC_ALL vs LANG env. variables
From: Jochen Hein <jochen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 07:46:05 +0100
Cc: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030305012805.GA19946@legolas.on.net.mk> (Damjan's message of "Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:28:05 +0100")
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/>
List-help: <mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-owner: <mailto:riel@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-utf8@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:linux-utf8-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-utf8-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-utf8-archive@nl.linux.org
References: <20030305012805.GA19946@legolas.on.net.mk>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-utf8-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2

Damjan <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is there a document that nicely explains why LC_ALL should not be used
> by distribution makers, but that LANG should be used instead. 
>
> I know the reasons, but would be happy if I can augment my case with
> some "official" docs.

I don't know any document for that.  My first try has been locale(7).
Care to send a patch for that to Andries?

Jochen

-- 
#include <~/.signature>: permission denied
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

References:
- LC_ALL vs LANG env. variables
  - From: Damjan

Prev by Date: ²úÆ·¼°ÍøÕ¾ÍÆ¹ãµÄ×î¼ÑÖúÊÖ
Next by Date: Training Course: The Egyptian Customs Law and the latest amendments
Previous by thread: LC_ALL vs LANG env. variables
Next by thread: Re: LC_ALL vs LANG env. variables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread