[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'

To: Werner LEMBERG <wl@xxxxxxx>, jenkins@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:45:31 -0800
Cc: bnb@xxxxxxx, opentype@xxxxxxxxxx, unicode@xxxxxxxxxxx, gnu-unifont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030221.000831.55486297.wl@gnu.org>
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/>
List-help: <mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-owner: <mailto:riel@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-utf8@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:linux-utf8-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-utf8-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-utf8-archive@nl.linux.org
References: <20030220.110113.59491225.wl@gnu.org> <20030220.001305.25156715.wl@gnu.org> <C9D5195E-4465-11D7-8304-003065F9CD7C@apple.com> <20030220.110113.59491225.wl@gnu.org>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-utf8-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 12:08 AM 2/21/03 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:

> Virtually all fonts I know of use the pre-3.0 glyph representations.
> Sigh.  Any suggestion how to fix this mess? [...]

To give just one very widely available example Times New Roman has always used the post 3.0 glyph.

A./
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
  - From: Werner LEMBERG

References:
- Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
  - From: Werner LEMBERG
- Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
  - From: Werner LEMBERG

Prev by Date: ÄúÊµÏÖÍøÂç°ì¹«×Ô¶¯»¯ÁËÂð?Á¦ÌìÈí¼þ°ïÄúÃ¦
Next by Date: Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
Previous by thread: Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
Next by thread: Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread