Re: Unicode, character ambiguities

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Followup to:  <200201100915.g0A9F0j23627@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By author:    Tomohiro KUBOTA <tkubota@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.utf8
> 
> I think there are a few more examples.  It is difficult to
> show "all" examples, like it is difficult for a native English
> speaker to show "all" verbs (s)he knows.  It is also difficult
> even for me to list "all" irregular English verbs (like
> go-went-gone and come-came-come).  However, I feel the number
> of examples would be very small.
> 

If so, that would imply the number of code points would also be very
small, and that it wouldn't be a major loss to assign code points to
them.  Would you agree?

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> at work, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/