[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Unicode, character ambiguities


> For reference of glyph, I am using 
> http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=f9b1
> and so on. 

I think that is confusing the matter more than necessary.
*Unfortunately*, what one gets when using the above is not
up to the image (glyph) quality that the Unicode consortium
usually maintains.  Please refer to:

1. The *official* Unicode standard charts, in PDF form(!)
	(e.g. http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U3300.pdf).

AND(!!!!!!)

2. The 10646-1:2000 charts, which for the Han characters have up
	to 5 reference glyphs (there are plans to use just one
	reference glyph for the next edition, just as already
	done for the Unicode standard, as well as 10646-2:2001).

Until you do so, I, at least, will continue to mostly ignore this thread.


		Kind regards
		/kent k

--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/