Re: Emacs and UTF-8 locale

[Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19 Dec 2001, Dave Love wrote:

>  > There are UTF-8 locales in use (e.g., vi_VI), which do NOT have
>  > UTF-8 in their name,
> 
> That looks like a bad example since, at least in glibc 2.2.4, the
> locale is listed as `vi_VN.UTF-8'.  That's fortunate, since Emacs uses
> VISCII for the unqualified Vietnamese language environment.
> (Similarly for Devanagari.

Will you accept 'fa_IR' as another example?

roozbeh

--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/