Re: unicode in emacs 21

[Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

 EZ> Unless you refer to the CNS plane and Japanese Han characters,
 EZ> which were deliberately left ununified (in addition to the
 EZ> Unicode codepoints for those characters), I think you are
 EZ> mistaken.

I.e., he's right.

Someone needs to give a cogent argument why it's a problem in practice
to have multiple representations if you can canonicalize as required,
especially why this should be any different for Western scripts than
for CJK.  Note that I have some practical experience of this in Emacs.
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/