[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unicode in emacs 21

To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: unicode in emacs 21
From: Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Nov 2001 16:08:45 +0000
Cc: fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, emacs-unicode@xxxxxxx, mgk25@xxxxxxxxx, linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx, oldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/>
List-help: <mailto:listar@nl.linux.org?Subject=help>
List-owner: <mailto:riel@nl.linux.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-utf8@nl.linux.org>
List-software: Listar version 0.129a
List-subscribe: <mailto:linux-utf8-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-utf8-request@nl.linux.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-utf8-archive@nl.linux.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0110271923020.17138-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <2427-Sat27Oct2001211021+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <87zo6c667e.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <200110280826.KAA01634@is.elta.co.il>
Sender: Dave Love <fx@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-utf8-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.107

>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

 EZ> The current plan for Unicode was discussed at length 3 years ago, and
 EZ> the result was what I described.  I don't think it's wise for us to
 EZ> reopen that discussion again

Well I, at least, don't understand why it's necessary, at least for
technical reasons.  I have a fair amount of experience as a user and
implementor.
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Prev by Date: Re: unicode in emacs 21
Next by Date: Re: unicode in emacs 21
Previous by thread: Re: unicode in emacs 21
Next by thread: Re: unicode in emacs 21
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread