[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unicode in emacs 21
I haven't meant for anything I've written to indicate that Emacs is not
a useful editor for UTF-8 encoded text. I have found it quite usable.
I've had a couple of configuration headaches along to way specifically
because I am simultaneously maintaining files in both UTF-8 and Latin-3.
If the alphabets you use fall within the ranges of characters that Emacs
now handles, I can't see any strong argument not to use Emacs. I
switched to the prereleases of Emacs 21 a few weeks ago specifically for
the Unicode support. For me, there was really no option of choosing
anything else, even if I had wanted to. I am doing some heavily
customized stuff supported by a pile of Emacs Lisp code tailored to my
data over the past 6 1/2 years. Emacs Lisp has saved me hundred of
hours.
In the end, I would like to see Emacs use Unicode internally.
Oliver Doepner wrote:
> I was happy to see Emacs 21 announced. but the unicode support does not
> seem to have moved forward very much - as i have heard and read from some
> people.
>
> my question: what happened in this area in Emacs 21 ?? Is the internal
> representation still the special MULE format ??~
> And are there any plans and/or activities to achieve these things ?
--
D. Dale Gulledge, Sr. Programmer,
dsplat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
C, C++, Perl, Unix (AIX, Linux), Oracle, Java,
Internationalization (i18n), Awk.
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/