[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Encoding conversions

To: <linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Encoding conversions
From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:18:20 +0430 (IRST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0109111110480.24778-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Markus Kuhn wrote:

> The ISO 10646-1:2000 definition of UTF-8 had that already. Unicode is just
> getting better aligned with the ISO standard here.

Yes I know. But I think this is good from them to do that. This way no one
can claim that they are doing UTF-8, and then tell "Well, Unicode's UTF-8
we meant..."

roozbeh

-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

References:
- RE: Encoding conversions
  - From: Markus Kuhn

Prev by Date: Re: URLs in UTF-8
Next by Date: libiconv homepage moved
Previous by thread: RE: Encoding conversions
Next by thread: RE: Encoding conversions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread