[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Encoding conversions

To: <linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Encoding conversions
From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:54:08 +0430 (IRST)
In-reply-to: <FNEHIHOMIIDPDCIFEJEGGEAICJAA.cbrown@xnetinc.com>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Carl W. Brown wrote:

> > No, Oracle did not design UTF-8 at all. The RFC 2279 specifies UTF-8,
> > and it encodes all characters from U+00000000 to U+7FFFFFFF.
>
> What I meant was the Oracle implementation of UTF-8.

They are now calling it UCES-8, the only remain will now be an Oracle
datatype named "UTF8" which is UCES-8 really.

UTC is also working on restricting UTF-8 to something equivalent to
RFC 2279's definition (well, for the range U+0000 to U+10FFFF) in Unicode
3.2. That's very good news I think.

roozbeh

-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Encoding conversions
  - From: Oyvind Holm
- RE: Encoding conversions
  - From: Carl W. Brown

References:
- RE: Encoding conversions
  - From: Carl W. Brown

Prev by Date: Re: Encoding conversions
Next by Date: RE: Encoding conversions
Previous by thread: RE: Encoding conversions
Next by thread: RE: Encoding conversions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread