Re: New charsets (7) manpage

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Followup to:  <20010806201133.A4534@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By author:    Radovan Garabik <garabik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.utf8
> > 
> > My understanding is that it's "OK but not ideal" to write "s" or "z"
> 
> In commonly used words, but that is considered to be an alternative
> spelling. 
> 
> Otherwise, it is OKish to write "sh" and "zh" when
> (for technical reasons) politically correct "š" and "ž"
> are not available. In practise, nobody cares and everyone uses sh and zh.
> 

Right, my goof: "sh" and "zh" is the appropriate substitute spellings.
Again, as you say, in practice noone cares and use them; they don't
even exist on standard keyboards.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> at work, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/