[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wchar_t <--> Unicode Conversion

To: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: wchar_t <--> Unicode Conversion
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jun 2001 12:43:07 +0200
In-reply-to: <20010601220005.A4450@nano.foo.net> ("Michael B. Allen"'s message of "Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:00:05 -0400")
References: <20010601220005.A4450@nano.foo.net>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7

	"Michael B. Allen" <mballen@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Why doesn't wchar_t play nice with Unicode?

It does, if your C implementation defines the macro name
__STDC_ISO_10646__ (see the C standard for additional information).
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

References:
- wchar_t <--> Unicode Conversion
  - From: Michael B. Allen

Prev by Date: wchar_t <--> Unicode Conversion
Next by Date: xterm(+luit) and XIM
Previous by thread: wchar_t <--> Unicode Conversion
Next by thread: Re: wchar_t <--> Unicode Conversion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread