Re: Doublewidth Cyrillic for unhappy Japanese people

[David Starner <dstarner98@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:11:00PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Plain text must be _logically_ same to the original.  For example,
> "Hoffman" in the original text must not be displayed as "Hofmann",
> though it has the same meaning regardless of usage of fixed or
> proportional and "ff" ligature.  Han Variants is like distinction
> between "Hoffman" and "Hofmann".

It's a dead horse, okay? Can we let it lie unless there's an actual
pragmatic reason to bring it up?

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and 
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/