[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doublewidth Cyrillic for unhappy Japanese people
Hi,
> From: Markus Kuhn <Markus.Kuhn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> The people who use ISO 8859 also use or used CP437 (the original IBM
> PC character set) is a widely used coded character set with a
I know some CodePage are used on PC, but why did not xterm
support CP437 if its characters are widely used and necessary ?
Ok, let's stop saying about which we don't know well.
Let's listen to the opinion of native users.
> Suggestion:
> Call the locale with the normal wcwidth behaviour
> ja.UTF-8
> and the traditional one (EUC backwards compatibility)
> ja.UTF-8@oldwidth
What is "normal" ?
What "normal" means for Japanese is different from yours.
This is not related with EUC-JP. This is not old or traditional.
The normal-width glyphs are not suitable for Japanese document.
The current wcwidth behaviour of xterm for Japanese locale is
a BUG (at least for me).
First, I wish xterm-152-27 is commited to the original xterm.
Thanks,
-------------------------------------------
Hironori SAKAMOTO <hsaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~hsaka/
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/