[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts

To: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
From: Tomohiro KUBOTA <tkubota@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:28:05 +0900
In-reply-to: In your message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:45:08 -0500 (EST)" <200103301745.MAA11860@vidar.niaaa.nih.gov>
Mail-reply-to: tkubota@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200103301745.MAA11860@vidar.niaaa.nih.gov>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) EMY/1.13.8 (Tastes differ) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.1 (AOI)

Hi,

At Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:45:08 -0500 (EST),
<yaoz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>  However,
>> if there is no Taiwanese style equivalent, then we should rather use
>> a Msmincho-Unifont for Taiwan than use a big5 font.  Completeness should
>> take precedence over regional style pecularities.

> Yes, I think a font with consistent style is THE most important thing too.

PILCH Hartmut, are you insisting that we should have CJK fonts with
common typeface (same boldness, same serif policy)?  Then I agree.

---
Tomohiro KUBOTA <kubota@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://surfchem0.riken.go.jp/~kubota/
"Introduction to I18N"
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

References:
- RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  - From: yaoz

Prev by Date: RE: CJK Unification
Next by Date: Re: CJK Unification
Previous by thread: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
Next by thread: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread