[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts

To: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
From: Tomohiro KUBOTA <tkubota@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 01:20:38 +0900
In-reply-to: In your message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:14:10 +0200 (CEST)" <Pine.LNX.4.31.0103301102010.1667-100000@querty.oas.a2e.de>
Mail-reply-to: tkubota@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102081416560.1265-100000@janus.arrow> <Pine.LNX.4.31.0103301102010.1667-100000@querty.oas.a2e.de>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) EMY/1.13.8 (Tastes differ) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.1 (AOI)

Hi,

At Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:14:10 +0200 (CEST),
PILCH Hartmut <phm@xxxxxx> wrote:

> All the visually distinctive glyphs have individual
> codepoints in Unicode anyway.

No.  Many characters with distinctive glyphs are unified.
"Visually distinctive"?  Are you blind?


> Most existing and future fonts look nice and well
> readable to all East-Asian nations.

Did you interview East-Asian people?  Or, what is your basis
of your opinion?

---
Tomohiro KUBOTA <kubota@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://surfchem0.riken.go.jp/~kubota/
"Introduction to I18N"
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  - From: Jungshik Shin

References:
- RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  - From: PILCH Hartmut

Prev by Date: RE: CJK Unification
Next by Date: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
Previous by thread: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
Next by thread: RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread