Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: Unicode-HOWTO 1.0
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: line breaking implementation available
  • From: Werner LEMBERG
• Re: line breaking implementation available
  • From: Bruno Haible
• RE: line breaking implementation available
  • From: Karlsson Kent - keka
• Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Andries . Brouwer
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Andries . Brouwer
• Re: line breaking implementation available
  • From: Werner LEMBERG
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Ulrich Drepper
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Re: line breaking implementation available
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Alexander Voropay
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Alexander Voropay
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Re: line breaking implementation available
  • From: Bruno Haible
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Andries . Brouwer
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: David Starner
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Project Gutenberg (slightly OT) (Was: Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems)
  • From: David Starner
• xterm-150-23-k10 patch
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Karl Eichwalder
• PTR: UTF-8-enabled w3m available
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: PTR: UTF-8-enabled w3m available
  • From: David Starner
• Re: Unicode and man/groff/less problems
  • From: Robert de Bath
• Re: TCL/Tk 8.3.2 and iso10646-1 fonts
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: TCL/Tk 8.3.2 and iso10646-1 fonts
  • From: Scott Stanton
• X11 BDF font update
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• GRAND OPENING www.tooltoad.com GRAND OPENING
  • From: www.tooltoad.com
• FREE Biotech Stock Info! 296
  • From: biotechstox86
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Kai Henningsen
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Frank da Cruz
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Kai Henningsen
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Bram Moolenaar
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Andries . Brouwer
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Kai Henningsen
• Re: Towards a new text terminal standard
  • From: Kai Henningsen
• Hey
  • From: Jeff Doucette
• xterm bug?
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: xterm bug?
  • From: Thomas E. Dickey
• Re: Xterm-Bidi-Shaping-Locale-Planes-XIM-LanguageTags etc Patch #27
  • From: Robert Brady
• GNU libiconv 1.6.1 released
  • From: Bruno Haible
• New version of Fribidi
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• reorder-after in locale definition
  • From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
• Re: reorder-after in locale definition
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• Re: reorder-after in locale definition
  • From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: PILCH Hartmut
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: PILCH Hartmut
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: PILCH Hartmut
• Re: reorder-after in locale definition
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• Re: CJK Unification
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Jungshik Shin
• Enanito si, pero con que pedazo!
  • From: Hahaha
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Jungshik Shin
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: Jungshik Shin
• Re: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: yaoz
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: Bruno Haible
• Re: CJK Unification
  • From: Alexander Voropay
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Jungshik Shin
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: yaoz
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: PILCH Hartmut
• Re: CJK Unification
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• RE: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Re: CJK Unification
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Re: Unicode is optimal for Chinese/Japanese multilingual texts
  • From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
• Help with autoconf
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• Re: Help with autoconf
  • From: Jake Morrison
• RE: CJK Unification
  • From: PILCH Hartmut
• Unicode 3.1 has been published
  • From: Markus Kuhn
• Re: [Groff] underlining in nroff
  • From: Werner LEMBERG
• Re: [I18n]Unicode 3.1 has been published
  • From: David Starner
• Re: [Groff] underlining in nroff
  • From: Thomas Dickey
• Re: [Groff] underlining in nroff
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: [Groff] underlining in nroff
  • From: Mark Nudelman