Re: Updated HOWTO

[Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, mleisher@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
>     Gaute> Argh, why is this mailing list clobbering the Reply-To
>     Gaute> header?  That was supposed to be a private reply.
> 
> Why was it supposed to be private?  It is useful to know that the
> 2.1 is still being referenced in spots.  I never would have known if
> you had replied privately.

It didn't seem like a big deal; just a typo, really.

The reason I'm annoyed is the principle of the thing.  I just hate to
find out that what I thought was private has actually been brought to
the attention of the world at large.  Obviously it makes no difference
in this case, but you can easily imagine scenarios where it would.

-- 
Gaute Strokkenes                        http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~gs234/
"THE LITTLE PINK FLESH SISTERS," I saw them at th' FLUORESCENT BULB
 MAKERS CONVENTION...
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/