[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc

To: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Aug 2000 11:35:15 +0200
In-reply-to: Markus Kuhn's message of "Wed, 09 Aug 2000 08:46:02 +0100"
References: <E13MQYt-0008Ke-00@wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

  Markus Kuhn <Markus.Kuhn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Florian Weimer wrote on 2000-08-09 06:59 UTC:
> > Some time ago, you strongly advocated for UTF-16.
> 
> When and where? Admittedly, I predicted in the original utf8 manpage
> that sizeof(wchar_t) == 2 on Linux,

Sorry, I seems as I've misinterpreted some messages from you written
back in October in which you said that anything beyond the BMP is only
interesting to scholars.

> STIX math proposal

Are there any ideas yet how to modify the tools nowadays used by
mathematicians to work according to this proposal?
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

References:
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: Markus Kuhn

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Next by Date: Re: C character properties and UTF-16 representation
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread