[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc

To: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Aug 2000 21:42:36 +0200
In-reply-to: Ulrich Drepper's message of "08 Aug 2000 11:13:36 -0700"
References: <FAFE609CB754D311B60C0008C75D3556048AAC08@dbwdfx14.wdf.sap-ag.de> <871yzzr6jn.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <m3ya27mxin.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

  Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> "Too late"?  If *never* would happen.  Every sane system has wchar_t a
> 32bit type.  Even the AIX people realized this and will switch to a
> 32bit type once they can figure out how to handle the compatiblity
> problem.

Hmm.  Why is UTF-16 so crazy? ;-)
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: Ping Yeh
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: H. Peter Anvin

References:
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: Brink, Ulrich
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread