[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc

To: "Brink, Ulrich" <ulrich.brink@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
From: Jamie Lokier <egcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 03:25:22 +0200
Cc: "'linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'sap-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <sap-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <FAFE609CB754D311B60C0008C75D3556048AAC08@dbwdfx14.wdf.sap-ag.de>; from ulrich.brink@sap.com on Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:28:53AM +0200
References: <FAFE609CB754D311B60C0008C75D3556048AAC08@dbwdfx14.wdf.sap-ag.de>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> Finally let me point out that the literals are more important for us
> than the library issue.

It would be nice to have UTF-8 string literals, but it is just a nice
thought.

-- Jamie
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

References:
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
  - From: Brink, Ulrich

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc and glibc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread