[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wcwidth() implementation

To: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: wcwidth() implementation
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09 Feb 2000 23:56:56 -0800
In-reply-to: PILCH Hartmut's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2000 23:42:11 +0100 (CET)"
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002092339200.6520-100000@aliuC2.oas.a2e.de>
Reply-to: linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-utf8@xxxxxxxxxxxx

PILCH Hartmut <phm@xxxxxx> writes:

> This is mainly interesting for roundtrip conversion or for special styles.
> Most CJK users will be happy to treat all alphabet-based characters as
> single-width.

I don't know where you have this information from.  From all the talks
I had recently it is clear that certainly is not the general opinion.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: wcwidth() implementation
  - From: PILCH Hartmut

References:
- Re: wcwidth() implementation
  - From: PILCH Hartmut

Prev by Date: Re: wcwidth(), glibc stuff etc.
Next by Date: xterm-unicode-0.6.diff crashes
Previous by thread: Re: wcwidth() implementation
Next by thread: Re: wcwidth() implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread