On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Frank da Cruz wrote: > (You might ask why UCS-2 is allowed as a transfer character set -- > why not stick with UTF-8? It's because CJK can be represented > more compactly in UCS-2.) But what is the advantage of UCS-2 compared to UTF-16 ? -phm - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/