[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm improvements

To: Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm improvements
From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:56:24 -0500 (EST)
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <40273002.9080007@cyberone.com.au>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm@kvack.org
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:

> Sorry I missed this Rik. The rsslimit patch is now too old
> to apply to the mm tree because of one of my patches.

No problem, I'll cook a new one.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm improvements
  - From: Nick Piggin

Prev by Date: Re: Documentation/vm/locking: why not hold two PT locks?
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.3-rc1-mm1
Prev by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm improvements
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/5] mm improvements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread