[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BENCHMARKS] 2.6 kbuild results (with add_to_swap patch)
- To: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [BENCHMARKS] 2.6 kbuild results (with add_to_swap patch)
- From: Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:11:06 +1100
- CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Nikita Danilov <Nikita@xxxxxxxxxxx>,linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401300704130.20553-100000@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
- Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm@kvack.org
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401300704130.20553-100000@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
- Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1
Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
>>Small big significantly better on kbuild when tested on top of the other
>>two patches (dont-rotate-active-list and my mapped-fair).
>>
>
>Where can I grab those ?
>
>
>>With this patch as well, we are now as good or better than 2.4 on
>>medium and heavy swapping kbuilds and much better than stock 2.6
>>with light swapping loads (not as good as 2.4 but close).
>>
>>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/3/
>>
>
>Neat! Does it have any side effects to interactive
>desktop behaviour ?
>
>
Hi Rik,
I've just tried the latest patchset on my desktop system. Doing
a make -j4 bzImage, hdparm -t /dev/hda in a loop, mozilla, gnome
xterms etc.
Nothing bad is happening, although I'm only just touching swap.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>