[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

More VM benchmarks

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx,linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: More VM benchmarks
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:29:28 +1100
http: //www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/5/
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm@kvack.org
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1

OK I'm not too unhappy with kbuild now. I've flattened the
curve a bit more since you last saw it. Would be nice if we
could get j8 and j10 faster but you can't win them all.

I'm not sure what happens further on - Roger indicates that
perhaps 2.4 overtakes 2.6 again at j24 although the patchset
he used (http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/3/) performs
far worse than this one at j16. This is really not a big
deal IMO, but I might run it and see what happens.

The systime benchmarks are just a bit of fun. They don't
mean too much because I didn't measure how much work kswapd
is doing...

Oh, the base kernel is 2.6.2-rc3-mm1 for -np3. I'll release
the patches shortly.

Best regards,
Nick

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More VM benchmarks
  - From: Nick Piggin

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.2-rc3-mm1
Next by Date: VM patches (please review)
Prev by thread: Re: 2.6.2-rc3-mm1
Next by thread: Re: More VM benchmarks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread