Re: VM benchmarks

[Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roger Luethi wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:17:57 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>I have 3 patches here http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/
>>that should apply in order. If you apply to the -mm tree, please
>>back out the rss limit patch first.
>>
>>If you can test them it would be good.
>>
>
>I added results for all 3 patches of yours combined (2.6.1 patched)
>and for the reversal patch I posted (2.6.0 revert). Clear improvements
>for compiling. Might be interesting to test the patches individually,
>but I will likely be unable to conduct further tests til next week. Let
>me know if there are any tests you are specifically interested in,
>and I will do more testing when I get back.
>
>

Thanks Roger,
Hmm results aren't bad... although the active/inactive balance
tuning you see here: http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/4/
isn't included (you're testing the green kernel)

If I can get things a bit more into shape today I'll post another
patchset.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>