Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm5 and below: Wine and XMMS problems

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:08:20AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 08:39:14PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Adrian,
> 
> Hi Nick,
> 
> > It would be great if you could test the latest mm kernel (mm6 as of now
> > I think), which has Con's latest stuff in it. You could also test my
> > newest scheduler patch. Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> I didn't check -mm6 (I had a different problem with -mm6 and not that 
> much time).
> 
> I tried plain test4 with your sched-rollup-v14 and I got these awful
> slower sound like when wou manually retard a record.

More data:
I tried test5 and test5-mm1.

Both produced this awful slower sound like when wou manually retard a 
record, although my subjective impression was that it happens fewer than 
with test4 with your sched-rollup-v14.

2.5.72 is still better than all recent kernels I've tested...  :-(

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>