[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm6

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:

>   We didn't get many reports from this in -mm5.  I'd prefer to stick with
>   Con's patches because they're tweaks, rather than fundamental changes and
>   they have had more testing and are more widely understood.
> 
>   But the performance regressions with specjbb and volanomark are a
>   problem.  We need to understand this and get it fixed up.

I believe Con has a lead on this already, the thing to find out is why 
sched_clock() causes such a regression.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>