[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related

To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 05:06:24 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <3EB8DBA0.7020305@aitel.hist.no>
Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-mm@kvack.org
Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <20030506232326.7e7237ac.akpm@digeo.com> <3EB8DBA0.7020305@aitel.hist.no>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:10:40PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> 2.5.69-mm1 is fine, 2.5.69-mm2 panics after a while even under very
> light load.

Could you try testing with the slabification patch backed out?

Thanks.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

References:
- 2.5.69-mm2
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
- Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
  - From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
Next by Date: Re: 2.5.68-mm4
Prev by thread: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
Next by thread: Re: VM limits on AMD64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread