[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related

To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Date: 07 May 2003 03:40:24 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <3EB8DBA0.7020305@aitel.hist.no>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <20030506232326.7e7237ac.akpm@digeo.com> <3EB8DBA0.7020305@aitel.hist.no>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 03:10, Helge Hafting wrote:
> 2.5.69-mm1 is fine, 2.5.69-mm2 panics after a while even under very
> light load.

Do you have AF_UNIX built modular?

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
  - From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
- Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
  - From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>

References:
- 2.5.69-mm2
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
- Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
  - From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.5.68-mm4
Next by Date: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
Prev by thread: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
Next by thread: Re: 2.5.69-mm2 Kernel panic, possibly network related
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread