[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: objrmap and vmtruncate

To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: objrmap and vmtruncate
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:29:32 +0100 (BST)
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>,<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <20030404161457.GE993@holomorphy.com>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 
> Hmm, aren't the file offset calculations wrong for sys_remap_file_pages()
> even before objrmap?

Yes - objrmap merely makes it difficult to find the missed pages later on.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

References:
- Re: objrmap and vmtruncate
  - From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: objrmap and vmtruncate
Next by Date: [PATCH] tweaks for page_convert_anon
Prev by thread: Re: objrmap and vmtruncate
Next by thread: Re: objrmap and vmtruncate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread