[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: [BUG][2.4.18+] kswapd assumes swapspace exists]

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [BUG][2.4.18+] kswapd assumes swapspace exists]
From: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:10:16 -0800
CC: linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <3E6E49BD.1050701@google.com> <20030311162922.373a2414.akpm@digeo.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826

Andrew Morton wrote:

>There's no point in bringing these pages onto the inactive list at all. 
>Suggest you look at keeping them on the active list in refill_inactive().
>  
>

Good point.  I will add that to my changes.

    Ross

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

References:
- [Fwd: [BUG][2.4.18+] kswapd assumes swapspace exists]
  - From: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>
- Re: [Fwd: [BUG][2.4.18+] kswapd assumes swapspace exists]
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Free pages leaking in 2.5.64?
Next by Date: 2.5.64-mm5
Prev by thread: Re: [Fwd: [BUG][2.4.18+] kswapd assumes swapspace exists]
Next by thread: 2.5.64-mm5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread