[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset

To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:01:50 -0800
Cc: bcrl@redhat.com, mbligh@aracnet.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <3E653D69.8000007@us.ibm.com>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <3E653012.5040503@us.ibm.com><3E6530B3.2000906@us.ibm.com><20030304181002.A16110@redhat.com><629570000.1046819361@flay><20030304182652.B16110@redhat.com><3E653D69.8000007@us.ibm.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> While we're on the subject, does anyone else find the p*_offset
> functions confusing?

How about sticking nice comments over them, rather than rampant renamings?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>

References:
- [PATCH] remove __pgd_offset
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Prev by thread: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread