[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset

To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:10:02 -0500
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <3E6530B3.2000906@us.ibm.com>; from haveblue@us.ibm.com on Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:03:15PM -0800
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <3E653012.5040503@us.ibm.com> <3E6530B3.2000906@us.ibm.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:03:15PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> ptes this time

Isn't pte_to_pfn a better name?  index doesn't have a type of data 
implied, whereas pfn does.  We have to make these distinctions clearer 
as work like William's PAGE_SIZE is being done.

		-ben
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>

References:
- [PATCH] remove __pgd_offset
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.5.63-mm2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Prev by thread: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] remove __pte_offset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread