[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a

To: The One True Dave Barry <dave@zork.net>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:08:09 -0800
cc: sneakums@zork.net
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <20021203195854.GA6709@zork.net>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0212011833310.15981-100000@imladris.surriel.com><6usmxfys45.fsf@zork.zork.net> <20021203195854.GA6709@zork.net>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

> 	This is correct, and believe it or not i'm even using
> 	2.4.19 + rmap15a, no other patches.  I don't have my hard
> 	numbers available, but the difference between builds was quite
> 	significant, something like:
>
> 	2.4.19 vanilla:
> 	real 85m
>
> 	2.4.19-rmap15a:
> 	real 102m

Assuming the extra time is eaten in Sys, not User, can you get a profile
of each, & post them?

M.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
  - From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>

References:
- [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
  - From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
  - From: Sean Neakums <sneakums@zork.net>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
  - From: The One True Dave Barry <dave@zork.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
Prev by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread