[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lse-tech] 2.5.40-mm1 - runalltests - 95.89% pass

To: plars@linuxtestproject.org (Paul Larson)
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] 2.5.40-mm1 - runalltests - 95.89% pass
From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org (linux-mm),lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net (lse-tech),ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net (ltp-results)
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <1033661465.14606.13.camel@plars> from "Paul Larson" at Oct 03, 2002 10:11:02 AM PST
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

> 
> Sorry I havn't had time to look at the -mm kernels in a while, I'll try
> to keep up with them better.
> 
> Attached are a list of LTP failures for 2.5.40-mm1 with ltp-20020910. 
> All are known issues such as the pread/pwrite glibc stuff and the
> readv/writev new behaviour (the ltp release next month will address that
> for new kernels).  The dio tests failed of course, since the fs was
> ext3.  It's my understanding that dio isn't supported in ext3 yet but
> please correct me if this is not true.
> 

No !! DIO is supported on ext3 (in 2.5.40-mm1).


- Badari
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

References:
- 2.5.40-mm1 - runalltests - 95.89% pass
  - From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>

Prev by Date: 2.5.40-mm1 - runalltests - 95.89% pass
Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26+ rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3
Prev by thread: 2.5.40-mm1 - runalltests - 95.89% pass
Next by thread: alloc_hugetlb_page() fails to kmap() memory while zeroing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread