[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86

To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:02:56 -0700
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <20021002215649.GY3000@clusterfs.com>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <3D9B62AC.30607@us.ibm.com> <20021002215649.GY3000@clusterfs.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>

> I'm a little bit worried about this patch.  Have you tried something
> like NFS-over-ext3-over-LVM-over-MD or so, which can have a deep stack?

No, I don't think we're that twisted. 
But feel free ... and have fun getting LVM to work first ;-)

IMHO, bugfixing arcane corner-case bloat issues can come later, if all normal
configs work.

M.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

References:
- [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
  - From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>

Prev by Date: Re: NUMA is bust with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
Next by Date: Re: NUMA is bust with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
Prev by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread