[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86

To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:43:20 -0400
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Fake-Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
In-Reply-To: <3D9B62AC.30607@us.ibm.com>; from haveblue@us.ibm.com on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:18:36PM -0700
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mm-archive@humbolt.geo.uu.nl
References: <3D9B62AC.30607@us.ibm.com>
Sender: Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:18:36PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I've resynced Ben's patch against 2.5.40.  However, I'm getting some 
> strange failures.  The patch is good enough to pass LTP, but 
> consistently freezes when I run tcpdump on it.

Try running tcpdump with the stack checking patch applied.  That should 
give you a decent backtrace for the problem.

		-ben
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>

References:
- [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
  - From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Next by Date: NUMA is bust with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
Prev by thread: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread